Saturday, May 16, 2020
Appellees Brief - 3553 Words
DIOXENOS B. SULIT ATTY. CHRISTINA ARIAS-SUMILONG I-D LEGAL WRITING 3/31/07 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II, CITY OF MANILA PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintif-Appellee, -versus- GA. G.R. No. 123456 PEDRO SARMIENTO Y TORDECILLA Accused-Appellant, x------------------------------------------x APPELLEEââ¬â¢S BRIEF SUBMITTED BY OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL #234 Palack St, GSIS Building, Brgy. Vito Cruz, Manila, Philippines By Dioxenos Barreras Sulit Associate Solicitor General SUBJECT INDEX Page No. Contents 1 Cover Page 2 Subject Indexâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Thereafter the all the perpetrators removed their mask one of them pointed a gun at her, took her to a nearby grassy area then and there forcibly raped her at gunpoint. She was able to identify Timeo Yhapp as the rapist and the accused-appellant Pedro Sarmiento as the one holding the knife and was jeering when she was being raped. DR. MA. ANNA MAE QUINTO was the Medico-Legal officer of the National Bureau of Investigation who examined Rivera on February 16, 2006 (about 10:30 a.m.), testified that the latter was positive of spermatozoa, vaginal laceration, and there were also bruises on Wandaââ¬â¢s thighs indicating forced entry on her vagina. Dr. Quinto presented the following report: ââ¬Å"Genitalia: external examination= abundant pubic hair, nulliparous outlet, no bleeding note. = hymen (+) complete, old healed .aceration at 4 and 7 oââ¬â¢clock. Speculum= vaginal wall no erosion/laceration. Cervix= pinkish, (+) whitish discharge. Internal examination= admist 1 finger with ease, Cervix= closed, small midline, firm, non-tender on wriggling, Uterus= small, Adnexae= negative for tenderness. Positive for spermatozoa.â⬠Demek and Angela Catindoyok were the two couple who found the victim standing by the road around 11:00 p.m. of February 14, 2006 while walking home after celebrating their first weddingShow MoreRelated(E. 2243-44). The Circuit Court Foundââ¬âAnd Wcs Concursââ¬âThat906 Words à |à 4 Pagesrelies on Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Olney Assocs., Inc., 72 Md. App. 367 (1986), in support of the proposition that WCSââ¬â¢s released of all its ââ¬Å"rights, claims, debts, liens, demands, and actions,â⬠in essence, that WCS waived its ââ¬Å"right to a waiver.â⬠(Appelleeââ¬â¢s Brief at p. 15; see also E. 2243-44 (ââ¬Å"[METROPOLITAN]: Itââ¬â¢s a right. They have a right to a waiver.â⬠)) In Olney, however, this Court was presented with a question as to whether a settlement agreement was a substitute contract that completely dischargedRead MoreCase Analysis : Miccosukee Tribe Of Indians Of South Florida 1242 Words à |à 5 Pagesd isputed this, asserting it was protected by sovereign immunity. â⬠¢ The court heard the matter, and established the plaintiffââ¬â¢s motion ordering the tribe to pay the total amount of damages. With interest at that point, the judgment totaled $4.1 million.. Brief synopsis of what happened at the trial court: The Third District Court of Appeal showed compassion to Bermudez, who has been attempting to collect the judgment since approximately 4 years ago. However, the court stated the tribe as a whole can tRead MoreAnalysis Of Amici Curiae Brief : A Petition Court2061 Words à |à 9 PagesAmici Curiae Brief: a petition to the court for permission to submit a brief in the action with the intent of influencing the court s decision from a person or group who is not a party to a lawsuit, but has a strong interest in the matter. Burden of Proof: A partyââ¬â¢s obligation to convince the decision makers in a trial that their facts are true by evoking evidence. Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searchesRead MoreSurvey of Law Final Study Guide Essay6030 Words à |à 25 Pagescreated the offense of interstate domestic violence. affirm To uphold, ratify, or approve. Anders brief A law brief submitted to an appellate court by publicly appointed defense counsel in which counsel explains that the defendantââ¬â¢s appeal is nonmeritorious and requests release from further representation of the defendant. answer brief The appelleeââ¬â¢s written response to the appellantââ¬â¢s law brief filed in an appellate court. Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 A federal statute
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.